Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs) are wireless networks formed by several nodes communicating on a peer-to-peer basis without being connected to any fixed infrastructure. These nodes could be laptop computers, personal digital assistants, mobile phones or sensors dispersed in an area to measure certain data and send the information to a larger node. Where a source node and a destination node are not within direct range, they communicate through multi-hop routing, i.e. nodes in between them relay messages between source and destination. The routing protocol plays a key role in finding and maintaining the route in MANETs. Routing protocol can be a uni-path and multi-path. A multipath routing protocol is designed to increase the reliability in MANET. This research work focuses on Quality of Service (QoS) based evolution of multipath routing protocol. For this purpose, diverse type of simulation scenarios is designed to find the impact of mobility, increasing the number of nodes and pause time in MANETs. The results revealed that multipath routing protocol has comparatively less delay (percentage decrease of 81.52%). While unipath routing protocols have less packet drop ratio (percentage decrease of 47.78%) and routing overhead (percentage decrease of 99.30%).
Published in | Advances in Networks (Volume 5, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.net.20170502.13 |
Page(s) | 47-53 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
MANETs, Unipath Routing Protocols, Multipath Routing Protocols, Mobility, Traffic Source
[1] | M. K. Marina and S. R. Das, “Ad hoc on-demand multipath distance vector routing,” ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communi- cations Review, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 92–93, 2002. |
[2] | L. Hanzo and R. Tafazolli, “A survey of QoS routing solutions for mobile ad hoc networks,” Communications Surveys & Tutorials, IEEE, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 50–70, 2007. |
[3] | D. G. Andersen, A. C. Snoeren, and H. Balakrishnan, “Best-path vs. multi-path overlay routing,” in Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement. ACM, 2003, pp. 91–100. |
[4] | N. S. Nandiraju, D. S. Nandiraju, and D. P. Agrawal, “Multipath routing in wireless mesh networks,” in Mobile adhoc and sensor systems (MASS), 2006 IEEE international conference on. IEEE, 2006, pp. 741– 746. |
[5] | S. K. Gupta and R. Saket, “Performance metric comparison of aodv and dsdv routing protocols in manets using ns-2,” International Journal of Research and Reviews in Applied Sciences, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 339–350, 2011. |
[6] | A. Tuteja, R. Gujral, and S. Thalia, “Comparative performance analysis of dsdv, aodv and dsr routing protocols in manet using ns2,” in Advances in Computer Engineering (ACE), 2010 International Conference on. IEEE, 2010, pp. 330–333. |
[7] | M. Z. Oo and M. Othman, “Performance comparisons of aomdv and olsr routing protocols for mobile ad hoc network,” in Computer Engineering and Applications (ICCEA), 2010 Second International Conference on, vol. 1. IEEE, 2010, pp. 129–133. |
[8] | G. Singh, D. S. Gupta, and S. Singh, “Performance evaluation of dht based multi-path routing protocol for manets,” International Journal of Scientific and Research Publication, vol. 2, no. 6, 2012. |
[9] | A. K. Gupta, H. Sadawarti, and A. K. Verma, “Performance analysis of aodv, dsr & tora routing protocols,” International Journal of Engineering and Technology, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 226, 2010. |
[10] | W. Kiess and M. Mauve, “A survey on real-world implementations of mobile ad-hoc networks,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 324–339, 2007. |
[11] | Hasan, M. Z., Al-Rizzo, H., & Al-Turjman, F. (2017). A Survey on Multipath Routing Protocols for QoS Assurances in Real-Time Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. |
[12] | Mallapur, S. V., Patil, S. R., & Agarkhed, J. V. (2017). Load Balancing Technique for Congestion Control Multipath Routing Protocol in MANETs. Wireless Personal Communications, 92 (2), 749-770. |
[13] | Bondre, V., & Dorle, S. (2017). Performance Analysis of AOMDV and AODV Routing Protocol for Emergency Services in VANET. European Journal of Advances in Engineering and Technology, 4 (4), 242-248. |
APA Style
Saman Shakir, Samiullah Khan, Liaq Hassain, Matiullah. (2017). QoS Based Evaluation of Multipath Routing Protocols in Manets. Advances in Networks, 5(2), 47-53. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.net.20170502.13
ACS Style
Saman Shakir; Samiullah Khan; Liaq Hassain; Matiullah. QoS Based Evaluation of Multipath Routing Protocols in Manets. Adv. Netw. 2017, 5(2), 47-53. doi: 10.11648/j.net.20170502.13
AMA Style
Saman Shakir, Samiullah Khan, Liaq Hassain, Matiullah. QoS Based Evaluation of Multipath Routing Protocols in Manets. Adv Netw. 2017;5(2):47-53. doi: 10.11648/j.net.20170502.13
@article{10.11648/j.net.20170502.13, author = {Saman Shakir and Samiullah Khan and Liaq Hassain and Matiullah}, title = {QoS Based Evaluation of Multipath Routing Protocols in Manets}, journal = {Advances in Networks}, volume = {5}, number = {2}, pages = {47-53}, doi = {10.11648/j.net.20170502.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.net.20170502.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.net.20170502.13}, abstract = {Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs) are wireless networks formed by several nodes communicating on a peer-to-peer basis without being connected to any fixed infrastructure. These nodes could be laptop computers, personal digital assistants, mobile phones or sensors dispersed in an area to measure certain data and send the information to a larger node. Where a source node and a destination node are not within direct range, they communicate through multi-hop routing, i.e. nodes in between them relay messages between source and destination. The routing protocol plays a key role in finding and maintaining the route in MANETs. Routing protocol can be a uni-path and multi-path. A multipath routing protocol is designed to increase the reliability in MANET. This research work focuses on Quality of Service (QoS) based evolution of multipath routing protocol. For this purpose, diverse type of simulation scenarios is designed to find the impact of mobility, increasing the number of nodes and pause time in MANETs. The results revealed that multipath routing protocol has comparatively less delay (percentage decrease of 81.52%). While unipath routing protocols have less packet drop ratio (percentage decrease of 47.78%) and routing overhead (percentage decrease of 99.30%).}, year = {2017} }
TY - JOUR T1 - QoS Based Evaluation of Multipath Routing Protocols in Manets AU - Saman Shakir AU - Samiullah Khan AU - Liaq Hassain AU - Matiullah Y1 - 2017/12/07 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.net.20170502.13 DO - 10.11648/j.net.20170502.13 T2 - Advances in Networks JF - Advances in Networks JO - Advances in Networks SP - 47 EP - 53 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2326-9782 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.net.20170502.13 AB - Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs) are wireless networks formed by several nodes communicating on a peer-to-peer basis without being connected to any fixed infrastructure. These nodes could be laptop computers, personal digital assistants, mobile phones or sensors dispersed in an area to measure certain data and send the information to a larger node. Where a source node and a destination node are not within direct range, they communicate through multi-hop routing, i.e. nodes in between them relay messages between source and destination. The routing protocol plays a key role in finding and maintaining the route in MANETs. Routing protocol can be a uni-path and multi-path. A multipath routing protocol is designed to increase the reliability in MANET. This research work focuses on Quality of Service (QoS) based evolution of multipath routing protocol. For this purpose, diverse type of simulation scenarios is designed to find the impact of mobility, increasing the number of nodes and pause time in MANETs. The results revealed that multipath routing protocol has comparatively less delay (percentage decrease of 81.52%). While unipath routing protocols have less packet drop ratio (percentage decrease of 47.78%) and routing overhead (percentage decrease of 99.30%). VL - 5 IS - 2 ER -