| Peer-Reviewed

Factors Affecting Performance of Donor Funded Nutrition Projects: A Case Study of Mercy USA Nutrition Project, Kenya

Received: 1 October 2015     Accepted: 16 October 2015     Published: 30 October 2015
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Projects remain the instruments of choice for policy makers in international development. Yet, paradoxically, the poor performance of projects and the disappointment of project stakeholders and beneficiaries seem to have become the rule and not the exception in contemporary reality. Kenya is one of the countries that receive a lot of donor support to set up nutrition projects for the purpose of improving the nutrition status of its population. Despite enormous resources channeled by donors in setting up these projects, little impact has been realized as trends in mortality rates continues to surge as a result of malnutrition. This study sought to establish the influence of training in project management and project identification on the performance of Mercy USA nutrition project. The researcher adopted descriptive research design. Census method was used for this research. The study instruments used were questionnaires with both closed and open ended questions. Statistical analysis was carried out using the Statistical package for Social Sciences (SPSS version 20). The study established that the performance of MUSA nutrition project was being affected by other factors other than training in project management. Project identification was also established to be a critical factor in performance of donor funded project. The results of this study can assist donors, donor supported agencies and other stakeholders to understand issues that support or inhibit the performance of nutrition projects.

Published in International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences (Volume 3, Issue 5)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijefm.20150305.26
Page(s) 546-555
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Project Training, Donor Funded Projects, Mercy USA Nutrition Project

References
[1] Albert, L. (2007). Development Projects Observed. Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
[2] Ahsan, K., Gunawan, I., (2010). Analysis of cost and schedule performance of international development projects.
[3] International Journal of Project Management 28 (1), 68–78.
[4] Belassi, W & Tukel, O. (2006). A new framework for determining critical Success/failure factors in projects. International Journal of Project Management 14 (3), 141–151.
[5] Brinkerhoff W. (2004). Institutional development in World Bank projects: analytical approaches and intervention designs. Public Administration and Development 14 (1), 135–151.
[6] Bryde, D., (2008). Perceptions of the impact of project sponsorship practices on project success. International Journal of Project Management 26 (1), 800–809.
[7] Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA), 2001. A results approach to developing the implementation plan. A Guide for CIDA Partners and Implementing Agencies, Gatineau, Canada. March.
[8] Baldwin, T. & Ford, K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41.
[9] Bates, R. (2007). The impact of training content validity, organizational commitment, learning, performance utility, and transfer climate on transfer of training in an industrial setting. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University.
[10] Campbell, J. & Pritchard, R. D. (1976). Motivational theories in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology pp. 191.
[11] Carrell, M. R., & Dittrich, J. E. (1978). Equity theory: The recent literature, methodological considerations and new directions. Academy of Management Journal, 55.
[12] Clark, R. E., & Voogel, A. (2007). Transfer of training principles for instructional design. Education Communication and Technology Journal, 33.
[13] Chauvet, L., Collier, P., Duponchel, M., (2010). What explains aid project success in post - conflict situations? The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 5418.
[14] Cooke, T. (2002). The “real” success factors on projects. International Journal of Project Management 20 (1), 185–190.
[15] Cracknell, B. (1988). Evaluating development assistance: a review of the literature. Public Administration and Development 8 (1), 75–83.
[16] Crampton, J., Wagner, S. (2004). Percept–percept inflation in micro organizational research: an investigation of prevalence and effect. Thejournal of Applied Psychology 69, 67–76.
[17] Crawford, P. & Bryce M. (2003). Project monitoring and evaluation: a method for enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of aid project implementation. International Journal of Project Management 21 (1), 363–373.
[18] DDO (2009): District Development Office: Annual Report. Mwingi District. Nairobi: Government printers Unpublished, government report; 2009:17.
[19] Diallo, A., Thuillier, D., (2004). The success dimensions of international development projects: The perceptions of African project coordinators. International Journal of Project Management 22 (1), 19–31.
[20] Diallo, A., Thuillier, D., (2005). The success of international development projects, trust and Communication: an African perspective. International Journal of Project Management 23 (3), 237–252.
[21] Eric N. Debra S. James T. (2005). The Theory of Constraints and it implications for Management Accounting. North River Press. ISBN 0-88427-116-1.
[22] European Commission, (2007). Support to Sector Programmes. Covering the Three Financing Modalities: Sector Budget Support, Pool Funding and EC Project Procedures. Tools and Methods Series, Guidelines, No 2.
[23] Eliyahu M. Goldratt. (2004). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement, ISBN 978-0-88427.
[24] Fowler A. & Walsh, M. (2008). Conflicting perceptions of success in an information systems project. International Journal of Project Management. 17 (1), 1–10.
[25] Freeman, E. (1984). Strategic Management; a stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman Inc.
[26] Gasper, D. (2004). Programme appraisal and evaluation: the hiding hand and other stories. Public Administration and Development 6, 467–474.
[27] Gow, & Morss, R., (2000). The notorious nine: critical problems in project implementation. World Development 16 (12), 1399–1418.
[28] Green R. & Haines, P. (2008). Performance measurement in Construction Logistics international. Journal of production economic, 69.
[29] Hodgkin, M. (2003): Sustainability in Water Supply and Sanitation. London press; 1994:15. [Draft wash Report February].
[30] Honadle, G & Rosengard, J. (1983). Putting “projectized” development in perspective. Public Administration and Development 3, 299–305.
[31] International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies: World Disasters Report 2009; Focus on Early Warning Early Action. Geneva: Red Cross publishers; 2009:23.
[32] IFPRI: Reaching sustainable food security for all by 2020. Getting the priorities and responsibilities right. Washington, D.C: IFPRI Projects; 2002: 36-38.
[33] Ika, L. (2009). Project success as a topic in project management journals. Project Management Journal 40 (4), 6–19.
[34] Ika, L.A., Diallo, A., Thuillier, D (2010). Project management in the international development industry: the project coordinator's perspective. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business 3 (1), 61–93.
[35] Jugdev, K., Müller, R., (2005). A retrospective look at our evolving understanding of project success. Project Management Journal 36 (4), 19–31.
[36] Jeffrey & Dennis (2004). Re-examining the role of training in contributing to international project success: a literature review and an outline of a new model training program. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 29 (3), 289–316.
[37] Khan, D. & Moe, T, (2008). Success criteria and factors for international development projects: a life-cycle-based framework. Project Management Journal 39 (1), 72–84.
[38] Kilby, C., (2000). Supervision and performance: the case of World Bank projects. Journal of Development Economics: 62, 233–259.
[39] Kleinschmidt, .J., Cooper, R. (2005). The relative importance of new product success determinants-perception versus reality. R&D Management journal: 25 (3), 281–298.
[40] Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research Methodology, Methods and Techniques. New age International Publishers.
[41] Kwak, .H. (2002). Critical success factors in international development project management. CIB 10th International Symposium Construction Innovation & Global Competitiveness. Cincinnati, Ohio. 9–13 September.
[42] Kozlowski, S., & Farr, L. (1988). An integrative model of updating and performance. Human Performance, 1.
[43] Kozlowski, S. & Salas, E. (2007). A multilevel organizational systems approach for the implementation and transfer of training. In J. Kevin Ford (Ed.), Improving training effectiveness in work organizations. pg 247.
[44] Locke, E. A. (1968). Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3.
[45] Meltzer commission (2000). Annual report. Mercy USA for Aid and development (2012). Annual report. Ministry of Agriculture: Food Security Kenya Briefing, Update September 2010. Nairobi: Government Printers; 2010:.3.
[46] Orodho, A. J. (2003). Essential of Education and Social Science Research method. Nairobi: Masola Publishers.
[47] Orodho, J. A. (2004). Techniques of writing Research proposals and reports in Education. Masda publishers.
[48] Petter, S., Straub, D., Rai, A., (2006). Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. Management Information Systems Quaterly 31 (4), 623–656.
[49] Pinto, J.K., Slevin, D.P., (2006)). Critical success factors across the project life cycle. Project Management Journal 19 (3), 67–74.
[50] Rondinelli, D.A., (2004). Projects as instruments of development administration: a qualified defense and suggestions for improvement. Public Administration and Development 3, 307–327.
[51] Roodman, D., (2006). Aid project proliferation and absorptive capacity. Center for Global development Working paper 75, 1–45.
[52] Schmid, B., Adams, J. (2008). Motivation in project management: the project manager’s perspective. Project Management Journal 39 (2), 60–71.
[53] Struyk, R. (2007). Factors in successful program implementation in Russia during the transition: pilot programs as a guide. Public Administration and Development 27, 63–83.
[54] Vickland, S, Nieuwenhujis, I. (2005). Critical success factors for modernizing public financial management information systems in Bosnia and Hergzegovina. Pub licAdministration and Development 25 (2), 95–103.
[55] United Nations Development Programme: Kenya Briefing Report on Food Situation. Nairobi: Government printers; 2010.
[56] UNICEF: Determinants of Malnutrition in Children: A Conceptual Framework. Nairobi: Government printers; 2009.
[57] World Bank, Independent Evaluation Group: Hazards of Nature, Risks to Development: An IEG Evaluation of World Bank Assistance for Natural Disasters. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2006.
[58] Theory of Constraints Handbook, ISBN 978-0-07-166554-4, p. 8 Goldratt, Eliyahu; Fox, Robert (1986). The Race. [Croton-on-Hudson, NY]: North River Press. p. 179. ISBN 978-0-88427-062-2.
[59] PMI. (2004). A guide project management body of knowledge. Third edition, project management institute Inc, Pennsylvania.
[60] PMI. (2012). A guide to the project management body of knowledge. Pennsylvania: project Management institute.
[61] World Bank. (2004). Infrastructure assessment, finance, private sector and infrastructure Group, Middle East and North Africa.
[62] World Bank. (2006). Millennium Challenges for Development and Faith institutions. The World Bank.
[63] Youker, R., (1999). Managing international development project: lessons learned. Project Management Journal 30 (2), 6–7.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Okumu Silas Otieno, Esther Waiganjo. (2015). Factors Affecting Performance of Donor Funded Nutrition Projects: A Case Study of Mercy USA Nutrition Project, Kenya. International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences, 3(5), 546-555. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20150305.26

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Okumu Silas Otieno; Esther Waiganjo. Factors Affecting Performance of Donor Funded Nutrition Projects: A Case Study of Mercy USA Nutrition Project, Kenya. Int. J. Econ. Finance Manag. Sci. 2015, 3(5), 546-555. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20150305.26

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Okumu Silas Otieno, Esther Waiganjo. Factors Affecting Performance of Donor Funded Nutrition Projects: A Case Study of Mercy USA Nutrition Project, Kenya. Int J Econ Finance Manag Sci. 2015;3(5):546-555. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20150305.26

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijefm.20150305.26,
      author = {Okumu Silas Otieno and Esther Waiganjo},
      title = {Factors Affecting Performance of Donor Funded Nutrition Projects: A Case Study of Mercy USA Nutrition Project, Kenya},
      journal = {International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences},
      volume = {3},
      number = {5},
      pages = {546-555},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijefm.20150305.26},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20150305.26},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijefm.20150305.26},
      abstract = {Projects remain the instruments of choice for policy makers in international development. Yet, paradoxically, the poor performance of projects and the disappointment of project stakeholders and beneficiaries seem to have become the rule and not the exception in contemporary reality. Kenya is one of the countries that receive a lot of donor support to set up nutrition projects for the purpose of improving the nutrition status of its population. Despite enormous resources channeled by donors in setting up these projects, little impact has been realized as trends in mortality rates continues to surge as a result of malnutrition. This study sought to establish the influence of training in project management and project identification on the performance of Mercy USA nutrition project. The researcher adopted descriptive research design. Census method was used for this research. The study instruments used were questionnaires with both closed and open ended questions. Statistical analysis was carried out using the Statistical package for Social Sciences (SPSS version 20). The study established that the performance of MUSA nutrition project was being affected by other factors other than training in project management. Project identification was also established to be a critical factor in performance of donor funded project. The results of this study can assist donors, donor supported agencies and other stakeholders to understand issues that support or inhibit the performance of nutrition projects.},
     year = {2015}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Factors Affecting Performance of Donor Funded Nutrition Projects: A Case Study of Mercy USA Nutrition Project, Kenya
    AU  - Okumu Silas Otieno
    AU  - Esther Waiganjo
    Y1  - 2015/10/30
    PY  - 2015
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20150305.26
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijefm.20150305.26
    T2  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
    JF  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
    JO  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
    SP  - 546
    EP  - 555
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2326-9561
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20150305.26
    AB  - Projects remain the instruments of choice for policy makers in international development. Yet, paradoxically, the poor performance of projects and the disappointment of project stakeholders and beneficiaries seem to have become the rule and not the exception in contemporary reality. Kenya is one of the countries that receive a lot of donor support to set up nutrition projects for the purpose of improving the nutrition status of its population. Despite enormous resources channeled by donors in setting up these projects, little impact has been realized as trends in mortality rates continues to surge as a result of malnutrition. This study sought to establish the influence of training in project management and project identification on the performance of Mercy USA nutrition project. The researcher adopted descriptive research design. Census method was used for this research. The study instruments used were questionnaires with both closed and open ended questions. Statistical analysis was carried out using the Statistical package for Social Sciences (SPSS version 20). The study established that the performance of MUSA nutrition project was being affected by other factors other than training in project management. Project identification was also established to be a critical factor in performance of donor funded project. The results of this study can assist donors, donor supported agencies and other stakeholders to understand issues that support or inhibit the performance of nutrition projects.
    VL  - 3
    IS  - 5
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Entrepreneurship Technology Leadership and Management, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Juja, Kenya

  • Department of Entrepreneurship Technology Leadership and Management, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Juja, Kenya

  • Sections