Existing tourist destinations draw an increasing number of visitors as travel and tourism continue to rise. In this scenario, the growth in demand for tourism gives rise to new markets, which means that tourism sites are facing more and more intense competition which makes visitor satisfaction on tourism destination a prerequisite for tourism destination development. It is for this reason this research was undertaken. The study was aimed at assessing visitor satisfaction on attractions and attributes at Tarangire National Park. Questionnaire was used for data collection and a total of 242 visitors (tourists) were sampled. The results showed that visitor satisfaction was highly significant between country of origin and accommodation (F = (1.359), df = 64, p< 0.000), attraction (F = (1.469), df = 64, p< 0.000), Game viewing roads (F = (99.32), df = 64, p< 0.003), and significant for interpretation (F = (85.745), df = 64, p< 0.036), game viewing (F = (85.190), df = 64, p< 0.040), and signage (F = (84.479), df = 64, p< 0.044), highly significant for nature of travel and signage (F = (22.620), df = 64, p< 0.000), and significant for game viewing (F = (10.668) df = 64, p< 0.005). Out of 15 attractions which were identified, elephant was considered the best attraction and the least was ostrich. Generally, tourists were satisfied with the attractions, attributes and services provided by Tarangire National Park and offers the best attractions with high number of elephants and diverse wildlife populations which provide a good view that contributes to enjoyment and satisfaction to visitors.
Published in | Humanities and Social Sciences (Volume 12, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.hss.20241203.12 |
Page(s) | 58-65 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Attractions, Attributes, Satisfactions, Tarangire National Park
Identified attractions | Frequency | Percent |
---|---|---|
Variety of Animals | 48 | 19.8 |
Baobab Trees | 11 | 4.5 |
Birds | 6 | 2.5 |
Bridge | 1 | .4 |
Cheetah | 2 | .8 |
Elephants | 118 | 48.8 |
Giraffe | 5 | 2.1 |
Landscape | 8 | 3.3 |
Leopard | 2 | .8 |
Lions | 10 | 4.1 |
Nature | 13 | 5.4 |
None | 11 | 4.5 |
Ostrich | 1 | .4 |
River Tarangire | 1 | .4 |
Swamp | 1 | .4 |
Zebra | 4 | 1.7 |
Total | 242 | 100.0 |
Identified Attributes | Categories | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Reception at the entrance | Poor | 12 | 5 |
Good | 90 | 37.2 | |
Excellent | 140 | 57.9 | |
Washroom | Poor | 10 | 4.1 |
Good | 72 | 29.8 | |
Excellent | 160 | 66.1 | |
Interpretations | Poor | 6 | 2.5 |
Good | 76 | 31.4 | |
Excellent | 160 | 66.1 | |
game viewing roads | Poor | 31 | 12.8 |
Good | 83 | 34.3 | |
Excellent | 128 | 52.9 | |
Accommodation | Poor | 3 | 1.2 |
Good | 73 | 30.2 | |
Excellent | 166 | 68.6 | |
Security | Poor | 5 | 2.1 |
Good | 58 | 24 | |
Excellent | 179 | 74 | |
Signage/sign post | Poor | 8 | 3.3 |
Good | 73 | 30.2 | |
Excellent | 161 | 66.5 | |
Game viewing | Poor | 7 | 2.9 |
Good | 52 | 21.5 | |
Excellent | 183 | 75.6 |
Tourist’s country of origin and travel behavior characteristics | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Attractions and attributes | Country of origin | Nature of travel | Status of visit | ||||||
F | Df | P-value | F | Df | P-value | F | Df | p-value | |
Reception at entrance | 53.230 | 64 | 0.8209 | 1.249 | 2 | 0.536 | 0.532 | 2 | 0.766 |
Washroom | 45.423 | 64 | 0.962 | 3.818 | 2 | 0.148 | 0.974 | 2 | 0.614 |
Interpretation | 85.745 | 64 | 0.036* | 5.608 | 2 | 0.061 | 1.276 | 2 | 0.528 |
Game viewing roads | 99.322 | 64 | 0.003 | 4.031 | 2 | 0.133 | 0.832 | 2 | 0.660 |
Accommodation | 1.359 | 64 | 0.000*** | 2.178 | 2 | 0.336 | 0.366 | 2 | 0.833 |
Security | 80.223 | 64 | 0.083 | 3.668 | 2 | 0.160 | 0.646 | 2 | 0.724 |
Signage | 84.479 | 64 | 0.044* | 22.620 | 2 | 0.000*** | 0.808 | 2 | 0.405 |
Game viewing | 85.190 | 64 | 0.040* | 10.668 | 2 | 0.005** | 0.180 | 2 | 0.914 |
Attraction | 34.706 | 64 | 0.000*** | 4.393 | 2 | 0.369 | 1.469 | 2 | 0.8.32 |
Attributes | Attractions Rating | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poor | Fair | Good | Very Good | Excellent | χ2 | Df | P-value | ||
Interpretation | Poor | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 55.552 | 8 | 0.000*** |
Good | 0 | 3 | 28 | 33 | 12 | ||||
Excellent | 1 | 2 | 9 | 71 | 77 | ||||
Accommodation | Poor | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 15.977 | 8 | 0.043* |
Good | 0 | 3 | 12 | 32 | 26 | ||||
Excellent | 1 | 2 | 25 | 74 | 64 | ||||
Security | Poor | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 58.387 | 8 | 0.000*** |
Good | 0 | 3 | 18 | 29 | 8 | ||||
Excellent | 1 | 1 | 19 | 76 | 82 | ||||
Signage/sign post | Poor | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 31.469 | 8 | 0.000*** |
Good | 1 | 4 | 17 | 40 | 11 | ||||
Excellent | 0 | 2 | 18 | 63 | 78 | ||||
Game viewing | Poor | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1.133 | 12 | 0.000*** |
Good | 0 | 4 | 25 | 19 | 3 | ||||
Excellent | 0 | 1 | 12 | 84 | 86 | ||||
Game viewing roads | Poor | 0 | 3 | 8 | 13 | 7 | 30.952 | 8 | 0.000*** |
Good | 1 | 3 | 19 | 39 | 21 | ||||
Excellent | 0 | 0 | 11 | 54 | 63 | ||||
Washrooms | Poor | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 25.710 | 8 | 0.000*** |
Good | 0 | 4 | 21 | 31 | 16 | ||||
Excellent | 1 | 2 | 15 | 69 | 73 | ||||
Reception at the entrance | Poor | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 34.706 | 8 | 0.000*** |
Good | 0 | 4 | 26 | 39 | 21 | ||||
Excellent | 1 | 1 | 9 | 61 | 68 |
AENP | Addo Elephant National Park |
[1] | Anibal Mario Joao N’damiCrames, BambangSupriadi, SinaSetyadi (2023). Enhancing Tourist Loyalty Through Destination Attributes and the Mediating Role of Tourist Satisfaction. Cross Current Int J Econ Manag Media Stud, 5(4), 73-80. |
[2] | Bosque, I. R. D., & Martin, H. S. (2008). Tourism satisfaction: A cognitive–affective model. Annals of Tourism Research, 35, 551–573., 1–20. |
[3] | Conference, I. T. (2008). the effects of service quality perceptions on visitor. |
[4] | Kaltenborn, B. P., Nyahongo, J. W., &Jafari, R. (2011). The attitudes of tourists towards the environmental, social and managerial attributes of Serengeti National Park, Tanzania, 4(2), 132–148. |
[5] | Lamoureux, K., &Matus, S. (2005). Assessment for sustainable tourism. |
[6] | Maciejewski, K., &Kerley, G. I. H. (2014). Understanding Tourists ’ Preference for Mammal Species in Private Protected Areas : Is There a Case for Extralimital Species for Ecotourism ?, 9(2). |
[7] | Matolo, R., &Salia, P. (2023). International Tourists’ Satisfaction with Service Quality at Serengeti National Park in Tanzania. Journal of Co-Operative and Business Studies (JCBS), 6(2). Retrieved from |
[8] | Mbowe, Wilfred &Ndunguru, Ernest &Gervas, Joyce. (2021). Tourism Development in Northern Circuit of Tanzania and Its Contribution in Improving Local People’s Livelihood. Applied Economics and Finance. 8. 56. |
[9] | Meng, F., Tepanon, Y., &Uysal, M. (2008). Journal of Vacation Marketing. |
[10] | Murrmann, S. K., &Mihalik, B. J. (2002). tourist satisfaction with cultural / heritage sites : The Virginia Historic Triangle. |
[11] | Nasution, A. P., Wibowo, E. A., Ramdani, R., &Rofiqah, T. (2021). Urgensity of Environmental Management System Implementation on Oil Palm Plantation Management Policies in North Sumatera. Journal of Social Transformation and Regional Development, 3(1), 1-6. |
[12] | Nowacki, M. (2010). The quality of attractions and the satisfaction, benefits and behavioural intentions of visitors: |
[13] | Okello, M. M., &Yerian, S. (2009a). Tourist satisfaction in relation to attractions and implications for conservation in the protected areas of the Northern Circuit, Tanzania, (March 2013), 37–41. |
[14] | Puad, A., Som, M., Marzuki, A., Yousefi, M., &Abukhalifeh, N. (2012). Factors Influencing Visitors’ Revisit Behavioral Intentions : A Case Study of Sabah, Malaysia, 4(4). |
[15] | Ritchie, B. W., Mules, T., &Uzabeaga, S. (2008). Visitor attraction satisfaction benchmarking project Sustainable Tourism CRC Tech Report Feedback National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Copyright © CRC for Sustainable Tourism Pty Ltd 2008. |
[16] | Sadeh, E., Asgari, F., Mousavi, L., &Sadeh, S. (2012). Factors Affecting Tourist Satisfaction and Its Consequences, 2(2), 1557–1560. |
[17] | Tarangire Map, 2015. Vorkinn, M., Vistad, O. I., &Vaagland, J. (2000). Tourist experiences and, 27(2), 432–450. |
[18] |
UNWTO (2023). UNWTO World Tourism Barometer and Statistical Annex, May 2023,
https://www.e-unwto.org/doi/abs/10.18111/wtobarometereng.2023.21.1.2 |
[19] | URT (2023). National Bureau of Statistics, International visitors for the period of January to February 2022, |
APA Style
Kantini, K. M., Kahana, L. W., Nyakyi, V. P., Kiondo, K., Goroi, E. (2024). Visitor Satisfaction on Attractions and Attributes at Tarangire National Park. Humanities and Social Sciences, 12(3), 58-65. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20241203.12
ACS Style
Kantini, K. M.; Kahana, L. W.; Nyakyi, V. P.; Kiondo, K.; Goroi, E. Visitor Satisfaction on Attractions and Attributes at Tarangire National Park. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2024, 12(3), 58-65. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20241203.12
@article{10.11648/j.hss.20241203.12, author = {Keaboka Monty Kantini and Ladislaus William Kahana and Vicent Paul Nyakyi and Khalfan Kiondo and Ebenezer Goroi}, title = {Visitor Satisfaction on Attractions and Attributes at Tarangire National Park }, journal = {Humanities and Social Sciences}, volume = {12}, number = {3}, pages = {58-65}, doi = {10.11648/j.hss.20241203.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20241203.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.hss.20241203.12}, abstract = {Existing tourist destinations draw an increasing number of visitors as travel and tourism continue to rise. In this scenario, the growth in demand for tourism gives rise to new markets, which means that tourism sites are facing more and more intense competition which makes visitor satisfaction on tourism destination a prerequisite for tourism destination development. It is for this reason this research was undertaken. The study was aimed at assessing visitor satisfaction on attractions and attributes at Tarangire National Park. Questionnaire was used for data collection and a total of 242 visitors (tourists) were sampled. The results showed that visitor satisfaction was highly significant between country of origin and accommodation (F = (1.359), df = 64, p< 0.000), attraction (F = (1.469), df = 64, p< 0.000), Game viewing roads (F = (99.32), df = 64, p< 0.003), and significant for interpretation (F = (85.745), df = 64, p< 0.036), game viewing (F = (85.190), df = 64, p< 0.040), and signage (F = (84.479), df = 64, p< 0.044), highly significant for nature of travel and signage (F = (22.620), df = 64, p< 0.000), and significant for game viewing (F = (10.668) df = 64, p< 0.005). Out of 15 attractions which were identified, elephant was considered the best attraction and the least was ostrich. Generally, tourists were satisfied with the attractions, attributes and services provided by Tarangire National Park and offers the best attractions with high number of elephants and diverse wildlife populations which provide a good view that contributes to enjoyment and satisfaction to visitors. }, year = {2024} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Visitor Satisfaction on Attractions and Attributes at Tarangire National Park AU - Keaboka Monty Kantini AU - Ladislaus William Kahana AU - Vicent Paul Nyakyi AU - Khalfan Kiondo AU - Ebenezer Goroi Y1 - 2024/06/27 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20241203.12 DO - 10.11648/j.hss.20241203.12 T2 - Humanities and Social Sciences JF - Humanities and Social Sciences JO - Humanities and Social Sciences SP - 58 EP - 65 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8184 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20241203.12 AB - Existing tourist destinations draw an increasing number of visitors as travel and tourism continue to rise. In this scenario, the growth in demand for tourism gives rise to new markets, which means that tourism sites are facing more and more intense competition which makes visitor satisfaction on tourism destination a prerequisite for tourism destination development. It is for this reason this research was undertaken. The study was aimed at assessing visitor satisfaction on attractions and attributes at Tarangire National Park. Questionnaire was used for data collection and a total of 242 visitors (tourists) were sampled. The results showed that visitor satisfaction was highly significant between country of origin and accommodation (F = (1.359), df = 64, p< 0.000), attraction (F = (1.469), df = 64, p< 0.000), Game viewing roads (F = (99.32), df = 64, p< 0.003), and significant for interpretation (F = (85.745), df = 64, p< 0.036), game viewing (F = (85.190), df = 64, p< 0.040), and signage (F = (84.479), df = 64, p< 0.044), highly significant for nature of travel and signage (F = (22.620), df = 64, p< 0.000), and significant for game viewing (F = (10.668) df = 64, p< 0.005). Out of 15 attractions which were identified, elephant was considered the best attraction and the least was ostrich. Generally, tourists were satisfied with the attractions, attributes and services provided by Tarangire National Park and offers the best attractions with high number of elephants and diverse wildlife populations which provide a good view that contributes to enjoyment and satisfaction to visitors. VL - 12 IS - 3 ER -